Scott v. Donald
Supreme Court of the United States
APPEAL FROM THE CIECUIT COUET OF THE UNITED STATES FOE THE DISTEIOT OF SOUTH ' CABOLINA. • In the .Circuit' Court of the United States for the district of South Carolina, on April 25, 1895, James Donald, a citizen of the United States and of the State of South Carolina, in his own behalf and'on behalf of all other persons in the State of South Carolina, as importers for their own use and consumers of the wines, ’ales and spirituous-liquors, the products of. other States •and…
Read the full summary
APPEAL FROM THE CIECUIT COUET OF THE UNITED STATES FOE THE DISTEIOT OF SOUTH ' CABOLINA. • In the .Circuit' Court of the United States for the district of South Carolina, on April 25, 1895, James Donald, a citizen of the United States and of the State of South Carolina, in his own behalf and'on behalf of all other persons in the State of South Carolina, as importers for their own use and consumers of the wines, ’ales and spirituous-liquors, the products of. other States •and foreign countries, filed a bill in equity against J. M. Scott, M. T. Holley, E. C. Beach and B. M. Gardner, claiming to…
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Shiras
Having, in the cases at law, in which the opinion has just been delivered,, and for reasons therein given, reached the conclusion that the dispensary law of Smith. Carolina, approved January 2, -1895, is so far unconstitutional and void that this *112plaintiff can maintain an action at law against these defendants for' seizing his liquors, we are called upon now to consider whether there is a valid remedy, by way of injunction to restrain executive officers from continued and repeated acts of trespass in seizing and carrying away, and confiscating for the use of the State the property of the-…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Osborn v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- In Re TylerSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Cummings v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Pennoyer v. McConnaughySupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Dodge v. WoolseySupreme Court of the United States · 1856
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by146 opinions
- Gibbs v. BuckSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Trump v. HawaiiSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
- Healy v. RattaSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Matthews v. RodgersSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Philadelphia Co. v. StimsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
141 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.