Doe v. United States
District Court, M.D. North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
OSTEEN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Jane Doe, John Doe, Baby Jane Doe, and Baby John Doe filed this action against the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”), 28 U.S.C. § 1346(b), et seq. Plaintiffs claim that members and civilian personnel of the United States Navy administered a blood transfusion to Jane Doe in 1983 negligently and without her informed consent. After a bench trial, the court issues the following findings of fact and conclusions of law.
I. FINDINGS OF FACT
Pregnant with her first child, Plaintiff Jane Doe arrived at the Navy Regional Medical…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- English v. Pabst Brewing Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
- Evelyn Mae Kokotis v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
- Blanchard v. KellumTennessee Supreme Court · 1998
- Cardwell v. BechtolTennessee Supreme Court · 1987
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Holland v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2004