Legal Opinion

Doe v. United States

District Court, M.D. North Carolina

Decided August 27, 2003No. 1:01CV00646PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

OSTEEN, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Jane Doe, John Doe, Baby Jane Doe, and Baby John Doe filed this action against the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”), 28 U.S.C. § 1346(b), et seq. Plaintiffs claim that members and civilian personnel of the United States Navy administered a blood transfusion to Jane Doe in 1983 negligently and without her informed consent. After a bench trial, the court issues the following findings of fact and conclusions of law.

I. FINDINGS OF FACT

Pregnant with her first child, Plaintiff Jane Doe arrived at the Navy Regional Medical…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. English v. Pabst Brewing Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
  3. Evelyn Mae Kokotis v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
  4. Blanchard v. KellumTennessee Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Cardwell v. BechtolTennessee Supreme Court · 1987

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Holland v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API