Greer v. Downey
Arizona Supreme Court
ERROR to the District Court of the Third Judicial District in and for the County of Yuma. Webster Street, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtKent, C. J.
This action was brought by Mercedes Downey, the defendant in error, for the recovery of the value of a horse claimed by her, which had been impounded and sold to the plaintiff in error, the defendant in the action, by the poundkeeper of the justice precinct, under act No. 41, page 32 of the Laws of 1893. Judgment was entered in the court below in favor of the plaintiff upon an agreed statement of facts, and that judgment is brought to this court for review by writ of error.
The agreed statement of facts shows the compliance in every particular with the requirements of the act, and the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co. v. BeckwithSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. MathewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Jones v. BrimSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Rockwell v. . NearingNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
- Armstrong v. Traylor and ElmoreTexas Supreme Court · 1895
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bowden v. DAVISOregon Supreme Court · 1955
- Thompson v. Tobacco Root Co-Op. State Grazing DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1948
- Gill v. WilderSupreme Court of Florida · 1928
- Lacey v. LemmonsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1916
- Puppies 'N Love v. City of Phx.District Court, D. Arizona · 2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.