Legal Opinion
Puppies 'N Love v. City of Phx.
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided October 18, 2017No. CV–14–00073–PHX–DGCPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
David G. Campbell, United States District Judge *818Plaintiffs brought suit against Defendant City of Phoenix, challenging a City ordinance that prohibits pet stores from selling dogs and cats supplied by commercial breeders ("the Ordinance"). See Phoenix City Code § 8-3.06. Plaintiffs argued that the Ordinance violated the Dormant Commerce and Equal Protection Clauses of the U.S. Constitution as well as the Arizona Constitution's prohibition on special laws, and was preempted by state law. Doc. 1. The Court permitted the Humane Society of the United States ("HSUS") to intervene. Doc. 37. The…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- U.S. Bancorp Mortgage Co. v. Bonner Mall PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Reid v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Reid v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Sentell v. New Orleans & Carrollton R. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Jett v. City of TucsonArizona Supreme Court · 1994
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Just Puppies, Inc. v. Anthony BrownCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2024