Legal Opinion

Commonwealth Ex Rel. Conway v. Preston

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 16, 1941No. Appeals, 2 and 13PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hirt, J.,

Both of these appeals are directed to the question of the proper placement and custody of Rudolph Borys, a 12 year old boy. Following the death of the only other child, his mother became insane and the present prospect is that she will continue to be confined in an institution for the rest of her life. The father died from accidental injury on May 28, 1941. Since the death of the father, Rudolph has been living in the home of appellants. They have been friendly neighbors of the Borys family for over nine years and are willing to maintain Rudolph in their home as a member of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DavenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  2. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Bloomfield v. FaxsteinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  3. Rumsey's CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  4. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Rockey v. HoffmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1927

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Spells v. SpellsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Commonwealth ex rel. Shamenek v. AllenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  3. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Reese v. Mellors Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  4. Commonwealth ex rel. Gregory v. GregorySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  5. Brown v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API