Legal Opinion

Ratcliff Architects v. Vanir Construction Management, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 23, 2001No. A089533PublishedCited by 26 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LAMBDEN, J.

The trial court sustained demurrers by Vanir Construction Management, Inc. (Vanir) and Don Todd Associates, Inc. (Todd) without leave to amend against the cross-complaint filed by The Ratcliff Architects (Ratcliff). The court found that Ratcliff did not have legal standing to sue, and we agree.

Background

In March 1994, the Berkeley Unified School District (BUSD) retained Ratcliff to provide architectural services for the rebuilding of BUSD’s Columbus Elementary School project (school project). In a contract signed in August 1995 (contract), BUSD retained Vanir and Todd to be…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Biakanja v. IrvingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Quelimane Co. v. Stewart Title Guaranty Co.California Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Ann M. v. Pacific Plaza Shopping CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Bily v. Arthur Young & Co.California Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Goodman v. KennedyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Greystone Homes, Inc. v. Midtec, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008
  2. Mega RV Corporation v. HWH CorporationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  3. Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Stmicroelectronics, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
  4. GACKSTETTER v. FrawleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  5. Kalnoki v. First American Trustee Servicing Solutions, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API