Legal Opinion

Greystone Homes, Inc. v. Midtec, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 2, 2008No. D051556PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

AARON, J.—

I

INTRODUCTION

In Aas v. Superior Court (2000) 24 Cal.4th 627, 636 [101 Cal.Rptr.2d 718, 12 P.3d 1125] (Aas), the California Supreme Court concluded that a group of homeowners could not recover damages in negligence from the developer, contractor or subcontractors who built their homes, for existing construction defects that had not yet caused either property damage or personal injury. In reaching this conclusion, the Aas court explained that while “tort law provides a remedy for construction defects that cause property damage or personal injury” (id. at p. 635), the “economic…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Seely v. White Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  2. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Evangelatos v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  4. J'Aire Corp. v. GregoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Shade Foods, Inc. v. Innovative Products Sales & Marketing, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2000

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. In re Sony Gaming Networks & Customer Data Security Breach LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2014
  2. Beacon Residential Community Ass'n v. Skidmore, Owings & Merrill LLPCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Stewart v. Electrolux Home Prods., Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2018
  4. Baeza v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. Mega RV Corporation v. HWH CorporationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API