Legal Opinion

Substantial Building & Loan Ass'n v. Real Estate Title Insurance & Trust Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 19, 1923No. Appeals, Nos. 131 and 132PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Linn, J.,

Plaintiff brought assumpsit on a negotiable instrument which defendant had paid. Defendant filed an affidavit of defense, raising the legal question “that plaintiff’s statement of claim is insufficient in law.....” and set it down for hearing under section 20 of the Practice Act. After hearing, the court below entered judgment for defendant. Plaintiff appealed.

Our inquiry must be “whether upon the facts averred it [the statement] shows, as a question of law, that plaintiff is not entitled to recover”: Rhodes v. Terheyden, 272 Pa. 397, 401.

The instrument, dated July 22,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rhodes v. TerheydenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  2. Franklin Sugar Refining Co. v. Lykens Mercantile Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  3. Hutchinson Baking Co. v. MarvelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  4. Salen v. BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
  5. Hannon v. Allegheny Bellevue Land Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1910

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kiekhoefer v. United States National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Geiger v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Pennsylvania Railroad v. BrownsteinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  4. Com. v. Consolidated Indemnity & InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API