Legal Opinion

Kiekhoefer v. United States National Bank

California Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1934No. L. A. 14804PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

Plaintiff was the owner of a valuable lot in the city of Pasadena referred to in the record as the Lake Street property. She became acquainted with Arthur Palmer, a real estate agent in said city. The latter induced her to execute to him a general power of attorney. He borrowed $8,000 from the Mortgage Discount Company, giving as security a trust deed upon plaintiff’s said lot, which he executed, together with a promissory note in the sum of $8,000, as attorney in fact of plaintiff, acting under said general power of attorney. This loan was handled through an escrow in the defendant United…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Mechanics' Bank v. Bank of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1820
  2. First National Bank v. GaySupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
  3. Moore v. GouldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Billings v. MorrowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
  5. Cluett v. CoutureAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Wilson v. LewisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  2. State Ex Rel. Nesbitt v. Liberty National Bank & Trust Co. of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  3. People v. CullenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  4. Oquendo v. Federal Reserve BankCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938
  5. People v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API