Legal Opinion

Pennsylvania Railroad v. Brownstein

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 3, 1956No. Appeals, Nos. 82 and 83PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Rhodes, P. J.,

This is an action of assumpsit in which the jury rendered a verdict for defendants. The court below re*68fused plaintiff’s motions for judgment n.o.v. and a new trial. Plaintiff has appealed from the judgments en-' tered on the verdict.

Plaintiff, The Pennsylvania Railroad Company, brought this action against Albert Brownstein and Bernard Brownstein, and Girard Sales, Inc., to recover the value of six refrigerators alleged to have been misdelivered to them.1

In considering the court’s refusal of plaintiff’s motion for judgment n.o.v., it is necessary that we view the record…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Lanni v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  2. Lehner v. MONTGOMERYSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  3. Wagner v. Somerset County Memorial Park, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  4. Martin v. WilsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  5. Nevling v. Commercial Credit Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Beaver Cem. v. Pa. Human Rel. Comm.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. In re Churchill Area School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. West Allegheny School District v. West Allegheny Education Ass'nCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API