Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United Pacific Insurance v. Capital Development Board

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided December 13, 1979No. 79 C 874PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

GRADY, District Judge.

Plaintiff, United Pacific Insurance Co. (“United”), brings this diversity action against the Illinois Capital Development Board (“CDB”) and Arrow General Contractors, Inc. (“Arrow”), seeking a declaratory judgment as to the parties’ rights and obligations under two construction performance bonds. Plaintiff is a Washington corporation with its principal place of business in the State of Washington. CDB identifies itself as an agency of the State of Illinois. Arrow is an Illinois corporation with its principal place of business in Illinois. CDB has filed…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Strawbridge v. CurtissSupreme Court of the United States · 1806

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Long v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
  2. NAACP v. State of Cal.District Court, E.D. California · 1981
  3. Batton v. Georgia GulfDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2003
  4. Hood v. Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015
  5. Oakhill Cemetery of Hammond, Inc. v. Tri-State BankDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API