Legal Opinion
Oakhill Cemetery of Hammond, Inc. v. Tri-State Bank
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided April 30, 1981No. 80 C 1699PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
MAROVITZ, District Judge.
Introduction
Plaintiffs Oakhill Cemetery of Hammond, Inc. (Oakhill) and Roy A. Roark bring this action against several corporate and individual defendants alleging violations of the federal securities laws and state law. Roark, an Illinois resident, is an officer, director, and shareholder of Oakhill. Defendants include: Tri-State Bank (TriState), an Illinois banking corporation; David Robinson, an Illinois resident and a loan officer in Tri-State’s employ; Arthur Franklin Corporation (A. F. Corporation), an Indiana corporation and former principal…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Cruz v. BetoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Moor v. County of AlamedaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Santa Fe Industries, Inc. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Valerie Boruski v. The United States of America, Merck, Sharp and Dohme Company, and the City of Chicago, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,656 Arthur Golden and Gladys Golden v. Anthony GarafaloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,783 Anthony A. Sutter v. E. B. Groen and Naomi GroenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- Fried v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1983
- Swanee Bee Acres, Inc. v. Fruit Hill, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.