Legal Opinion

Hood v. Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc.

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided January 2, 2015No. MDL No. 13-02428-DPW; Civil Action No. 14-12384-DPWPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

DOUGLAS P. WOODLOCK, District Judge.

The Attorney General of Mississippi on behalf of the State of Mississippi filed this action against Defendants Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc. and Fresenius USA, Inc. (collectively “Fresenius”) in the Chancery Court of DeSoto County, Mississippi.

The case made its way to me in Boston following removal to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi and then through transfer by the Judicial Panel for Multidistrict Litigation under the rubric: In re Fresenius Granuflo/Naturalyte Dialysate Products…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
  2. Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Newman-Green, Inc. v. Alfonzo-LarrainSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Moor v. County of AlamedaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Navarro Savings Assn. v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Orchid Quay, LLC v. Suncor Bristol Bay, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2016
  2. Henok v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 2015
  3. Fresenius Med. Care Holdings, Inc. v. HoodMississippi Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 2026
  5. Colson v. Suffolk County BostonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2022

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API