Legal Opinion

Scott v. Bohe

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 9, 1927No. 11,812PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Burke

These parties appear here in the same order as in the trial court and we hereinafter refer to them as plaintiff and defendant.

Plaintiff brought replevin to recover a picture. To review a judgment against him he prosecutes this writ and asks that it be made a supersedeas. Defendant joins him in requesting final judgment on this application.

The first question confronting us is, Was this judgment on the merits? Plaintiff says, “No”; defendant says, “Yes.”

The cause was tried to the court, taken under advisement, and written briefs filed. It was decided October 12, 1926. The record simply recites…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stough v. ReevesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1908
  2. McMillan v. HarbertSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923
  3. Lamping v. KeenanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1886
  4. Denver Live Stock Commission Co. v. ParksSupreme Court of Colorado · 1907
  5. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp. v. Joslin Dry Goods Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1914

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wagner v. FairlambSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963
  2. Colorado Investment & Realty Co. v. Riverview Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928
  3. Bohe v. ScottSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928
  4. City of Central v. AxtonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1962
  5. Cortez v. BrokawColorado Court of Appeals · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API