Legal Opinion

Guilford Builders Supply Co. v. Reynolds

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 25, 1959No. 598PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeNNY, J.

The appellant’s only exceptions and assignments of error are directed to the allowance of the defendants’ motion for judgment as of nonsuit as to the respective defendants on behalf of whom the motion was sustained.

In addition to the evidence set out above, the plaintiff introduced adverse examinations of all the defendants. These adverse examinations established the fact that Oakmont, Inc. never held .any corporate meetings after the meeting of 21 March 1947, at which meeting the incorporators elected J. T. Reynolds, G. W. Reynolds, and Edythe Reynolds, directors of the corporation. On the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rothrock v. . NaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  2. Wood v. StatonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  3. Wood v. . StatonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Zickgraf Hardwood Co. v. SeayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  2. In Re HareDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1962
  3. G. R. Little Agency, Inc. v. JenningsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  4. 7 O.S.H. Cas.(bna) 1031, 1979 O.S.H.D. (Cch) P 23,306 W. P. Moore, Virgil A. Hundtofte and Life Science Products Company, a Corporation v. Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission and Ray Marshall, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979
  5. Bergy Bros., Inc. v. Zeeland Feeder Pig, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API