Legal Opinion

Wood v. . Staton

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 10, 1917PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

It appears that plaintiff company sold to the Tarboro Cotton Factory, to be used in operating the mill, a bill of coal to the amount of $400. The cotton mill having become insolvent, and plaintiff's debt remaining unpaid, he instituted this action, seeking to hold individual defendants personally liable for the debt. (247)

The principal facts relevant to the questions presented, and his Honor's judgment thereon, are as follows:

1. That the Tarboro Cotton Factory was a duly incorporated and organized corporation under the laws of North Carolina prior to December, 1913.

2. That on said date L. E.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Finnegan v. NoerenbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  2. Mokelumne Hill Canal & Mining Co. v. WoodburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
  3. Marshall v. KeachIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Ricks v. . BrooksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  5. Doe Ex Dem. Burke v. ElliottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1844

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kosman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  2. First Title & Securities Co. of Bloomington v. United States Gypsum Co., of ChicagoSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  3. Guilford Builders Supply Co. v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  4. First National Bank v. Tarboro Cotton FactorySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  5. Kosman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API