Legal Opinion
Armstrong v. Farrell
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided June 19, 1958No. 4 Div. 860PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COLEMAN, Justice.
This is an appeal by a defendant from an adverse verdict and judgment in an action of trover for conversion of certain dry cleaning equipment. Defendant’s motion for a new trial was overruled. The only error assigned is the action of the trial court overruling the motion for a new trial.
The grounds of the motion argued by appellant are that:
“A. The verdict of the jury was a compromise verdict.
“B. Under no phase of the testimony was there a basis for the finding of the jury that the defendant was liable to the plaintiffs in the sum of $1500.00, the amount of the jury verdict.
“C…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Holcombe Bowden v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- Ballenger v. Liberty National Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1957
- Hodges v. WestmorelandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
- M'Gowen v. YoungSupreme Court of Alabama · 1830
- W. Cleve Stokes Co. v. RushtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
3Cited by5 opinions
- Roberson v. AmmonsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
- Parker v. SuttonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1971
- Carl M. Limbaugh v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
- Parker v. SuttonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1971
- Roberson v. AmmonsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985