Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Farrell

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 19, 1958No. 4 Div. 860PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLEMAN, Justice.

This is an appeal by a defendant from an adverse verdict and judgment in an action of trover for conversion of certain dry cleaning equipment. Defendant’s motion for a new trial was overruled. The only error assigned is the action of the trial court overruling the motion for a new trial.

The grounds of the motion argued by appellant are that:

“A. The verdict of the jury was a compromise verdict.
“B. Under no phase of the testimony was there a basis for the finding of the jury that the defendant was liable to the plaintiffs in the sum of $1500.00, the amount of the jury verdict.
“C…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Holcombe Bowden v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  2. Ballenger v. Liberty National Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1957
  3. Hodges v. WestmorelandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  4. M'Gowen v. YoungSupreme Court of Alabama · 1830
  5. W. Cleve Stokes Co. v. RushtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Roberson v. AmmonsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  2. Parker v. SuttonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1971
  3. Carl M. Limbaugh v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
  4. Parker v. SuttonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1971
  5. Roberson v. AmmonsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API