Hodges v. Westmoreland
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
The suit is in two counts, for conversion of personalty and for the destruction of a: lien. The sufficiency of the count, in case, for the destruction of the lien, is not controverted, and nothing is decided as to this. There was judgment for plaintiff.
Assignments of error challenge the sustaining of demurrer to plea 2 and the rui ings in rejection of evidence. Appellant’s counsel says that these rulings present the same question: The right of plaintiff to recover from the defendant usurious interest included- in the mortgage, upon which the suit is based. The questions: “Westmoreland only…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- McGuire v. Van PeltSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
- Howton v. MathiasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
- Hicks v. MeadowsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
- Nance v. GraySupreme Court of Alabama · 1904
- Ryan v. YoungSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Albertville Trading Co. v. CritcherSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- Reed v. RowellSupreme Court of Vermont · 1926
- Stewart v. BurginSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Farmers Ginners Cotton Oil Company v. HoganSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
- Armstrong v. FarrellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.