Legal Opinion

Holcombe Bowden v. Reynolds

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 17, 1917No. 5 Div. 660PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court, Chilton County; A. H. Alston, Judge. Action by S. J. Reynolds against Holcombe & Bowden and others. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants appeal. Transferred from Court of Appeals under section 6, Acts 1911, p. 449.

1Opinion of the CourtSayre, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment rendered by the court without the intervention of a. jury. The question at issue was: What balance did the appellant Avery owe appellee on a mortgage debt? Appellants contended that Avery’s debt had been satisfied in full, and brought evidence to sustain their contention. The evidence for appellee tended in part to show an amount due considerably in excess of the amount for which judgment was rendered, and in other part an amount considerably less. There was no evidence to justify a finding of the amount for which judgment was rendered; nor can it be said,…

2Cited by21 opinions

  1. Alabama Waterproofing Co., Inc. v. HanbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  2. Stetson v. StindtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1922
  3. San-Ann Service Inc. v. BedingfieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
  4. Donavan v. FandrichSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
  5. General Motors Corp. v. Van MarterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API