Legal Opinion

Carl M. Limbaugh v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., a Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided March 18, 1986No. 85-7408Published

1Opinion of the Court

ALAIMO, Chief District Judge:

In its second appearance before this Court, 1 this case presents a question concerning Alabama damages law. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Merrill Lynch on the basis that appellant Limbaugh had not demonstrated any actual injury and, hence, was not entitled to recover either compensatory or punitive damages under Alabama law. We AFFIRM.

I

This is a diversity suit by an investor (Limbaugh) against his broker (Merrill Lynch) for unlawful conversion. Merrill Lynch allegedly converted monies from Limbaugh’s “Ready Assets” account to recoup the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Purcell Co., Inc. v. Spriggs Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  2. Amason v. First State Bank of LinevilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  3. Ala. Great Southern Railroad v. SellersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  4. Maring-Crawford Motor Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
  5. Carl M. Limbaugh v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API