Blalock v. Williams
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
This is a workmen’s compensation case. The sole question for decision is whether there is any material evidence to support the trial court’s finding that the employee suffered a permanent partial disability of sixty percent to the body as a whole as a result of his job-connected injury.
It was admitted in the trial court that the employee, Carl Vestal Williams, Jr., injured his back in an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment, and was entitled to recover benefits for temporary total disability and medical expenses. It is also admitted, at least for the purpose of…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Swift & Co. v. HowardTennessee Supreme Court · 1948
- Floyd v. Tennessee Dickel Distilling CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 1971
- Minton v. LeonardTennessee Supreme Court · 1967
- Moyers v. Oman Construction Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1969
4Cited by6 opinions
- Beck v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1989
- Johnson v. Midwesco, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1990
- Worthington v. Modine Manufacturing Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1990
- Murray Ohio Manufacturing Company v. VinesTennessee Supreme Court · 1973
- Hill v. Royal Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.