Legal Opinion

Worthington v. Modine Manufacturing Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided October 22, 1990PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANDERSON, Justice.

In this worker’s compensation action, employer appeals the trial court’s award of permanent partial disability benefits to employee resulting from a back injury. Employer contends the evidence is insufficient to support a permanent award because the percentage of anatomical disability did not change from the percentage assessed after an earlier work-connected back injury. We disagree and affirm.

FACTS

The plaintiff/appellant, Don Worthing-ton, age 51, was initially employed by defendant/appellee, Modine Manufacturing Company, in 1969 as a material handler. In 1973 he…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Corcoran v. Foster Auto GMC, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Lollar v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Roberson v. Loretto Casket Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Floyd v. Tennessee Dickel Distilling CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Holder v. Wilson Sporting Goods Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Cleek v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Collins v. Howmet Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Henson v. City of LawrenceburgTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Walker v. Saturn Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Brown v. Campbell County Board of EducationTennessee Supreme Court · 1995

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API