Legal Opinion

Floyd v. Tennessee Dickel Distilling Company

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1971PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Humphreys

This is an appeal by the defendant employer in a Workmen’s Compensation case. The principal question for review is whether there is any material evidence in the record to support the findings of the Chancellor.

The proof below on behalf of the petitioner employee, Evelyn Floyd, consisted solely of her own testimony. Mrs. Floyd testified that while working for the defendant, Tennessee Dickel Distilling Company, at a job that required repeated bending, lifting and twisting, she experienced severe back pains. She further testified that as a result of these pains she sought treatment from her…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Swift & Co. v. HowardTennessee Supreme Court · 1948
  2. PROCTER & GAMBLE DEFENSE CORPORATION v. WestTennessee Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Irwin v. Fulton Sylphon Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Atlas Powder Company v. GrimesTennessee Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Minton v. LeonardTennessee Supreme Court · 1967

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Thomas v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Corcoran v. Foster Auto GMC, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Patterson v. Rockwell InternationalTennessee Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. TaylorTennessee Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. LaneTennessee Supreme Court · 1978

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API