Legal Opinion
Geelan v. St. Patrick's Church of West Neck
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 5, 1942PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSwezey, J.
This is a motion pursuant to rule 112 of the Rules of Civil Practice, for judgment on the pleadings dismissing the complaint as to the defendant town of Huntington on the ground that it fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against this defendant.
The action is for damages for personal injuries alleged to have been caused because of snow and ice on one of the public *433streets in the town of Huntington, New York, also because of the insufficient lighting. The accident happened on January 16, 1942. A notice of claim was served on March 27,1942.
The motion of the defendant…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Thomann v. City of RochesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Ponsrok v. City of YonkersNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- In re James Passero & Sons, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
- Rogers v. . Village of Port ChesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Bristol v. BuckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Aqua Dredge, Inc. v. Little Harbor Sound Civic Improvement Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Tannenbaum v. City of New York, New York City Rapid Transit SystemAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1944