Legal Opinion

Bristol v. Buck

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 3, 1922PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Appeal by George S. Buck and others from a peremptory mandamus order of the Supreme Court, made at the Rensselaer Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Albany on the 3d day of February, 1922, commanding said appellants to pay and transfer to the State Treasurer moneys belonging to the Public School Teachers’ Retirement Fund of the City of Buffalo.

1Opinion of the Court

Cochrane, P. J.:

The Buffalo City Charter (Laws of 1914, chap. 217, § 294 et seq., as amd. by Laws of 1918, chap. 534, and Laws of 1919, chap. 56) provides for a Public School Teachers’ Retirement Fund of *101that city. The appellants herein under the provisions of said charter are the trustees and custodian respectively of such fund.

Article XLIII-B of the Education Law provides for a State Teachers’ Retirement Fund for Public School Teachers. The respondents herein under said act constitute the Retirement Board of such Retirement System.

Section 1109-b of said article XLIII-B as it existed on…

2Cited by21 opinions

  1. Osborn v. City of WhittierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  2. In re the Estate of MaulNew York Surrogate's Court · 1941
  3. Bradburn v. McIntoshCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1947
  4. Pineland Lumber Co. v. RobinsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
  5. Hoffman v. City of Palm SpringsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API