Legal Opinion

People v. Hoek

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 1912No. Docket No. 152PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to the superior court of Grand Rapids; Stuart, J. Paul Hoek was convicted of keeping a house of ill-fame.

1Opinion of the CourtSteere, J.

The respondent was convicted, in the superior court of the city of Grand Rapids, of keeping a disorderly house at No. 105 Commerce street in said city on divers days between April 26,1909, and March 1,1910, in violation of section 11697, 3 Comp. Laws.

The testimony is undisputed that respondent had charge of the premises in question, and was known as the proprietor. There were 12 rooms in the building, and he rented them to various occupants. He resided elsewhere with his family. He carried a key to this building, and looked after it and conducted its affairs, managing it in a general…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. SlighMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  2. People v. WrightMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Commonwealth v. BallouMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. McClinticMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  2. People v. HiderMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. Sears v. Illinois Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API