Legal Opinion

People v. McClintic

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1916No. Docket No. 125PublishedCited by 28 opinions

Error to Ingham; Collingwood, J. Nelson McClintic was convicted of perjury.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, C. J.

The defendant was charged with, and convicted of, the crime of perjury, alleged to have been committed on April 7, 1916, at the city of Lansing, on the examination of one Theodore De Meaux, at a court held by Charles F. Haight, a justice of the peace, the said De Meaux being charged before said justice, on the complaint of one Frank Eurek, with the offense of unlawfully furnishing intoxicating liquor to the defendant herein, on March 24, 1916, at the city of Lansing, in violation of Act No. 207, Pub. Acts 1889, as amended.

The information in the instant case charges that upon such examination…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. PrestidgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  2. People v. DeForeMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Billingsley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1906
  4. People v. BechtelMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  5. People v. RogulskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1914

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. People v. ZeiglerMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  2. People v. LutherMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Goins v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938
  4. People v. JackzoMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  5. State v. StoreySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API