Legal Opinion

City of San Diego

California Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1894No. 19031PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

The Court.—

In this case Department One rendered the following opinion, which was prepared by Mr. Commissioner Searls. We still adhere to the views therein expressed:

“ This is an action to quiet title to the east half of pueblo lot 1215, containing about forty-five acres of land,

*524situated in the city of San Diego. The appeal is taken by defendant from a judgment in favor of plaintiff adjudging him to be entitled to said east half of pueblo lot 1215, according to the Poole map of the pueblo lands of the city of San Diego, made in 1856, and adjudging that defendant has no title thereto, etc.;…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Caffrey v. DudgeonIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Merriam v. Boston, Clinton & Fitchburg RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
  3. Jamison v. FopianaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1869
  4. Wendel v. NorthWisconsin Supreme Court · 1869

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Miller v. McKennaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Stringham v. Mutual Ins.Oregon Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Hall v. Fairchild-Gilmore-Wilton Co.California Court of Appeal · 1924
  4. Gordon v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Goldman v. GoldmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API