Gordon v. City of San Diego
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County and from an order denying a new trial-W. L. Pierce, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Haynes, C.
This is a second appeal. Upon the former appeal the judgment against the city was reversed and a new trial ordered, and upon such new trial the plaintiff again obtained judgment.
The action is to quiet title to the east half of pueblo lot 1215, containing about forty-five acres, situate in said city. For a general statement of the facts, see the opinion rendered upon the first appeal, reported in 101 Cal. 522; 40 Am. St. Rep. 73. Only such different or additional facts as were developed upon the second trial need be stated here.
1. As affecting the validity of the deed to Whaley, it…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bank of United States v. DandridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
- Jacob v. LorenzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Fogarty v. FinlayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
- City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Gleason v. GleasonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Griffith Co. v. San Diego College for WomenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Miller v. JansenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- McDougall v. McDougallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- City of King City v. Community Bank of CentralCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- McGorray v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.