Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Davison

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 1915No. Docket No. 94PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Alpena; Emerick, J. Bill by Austin L. Rogers against Robert A. Davison to remove a cloud from complainant’s title, and to restrain an action at law. From a decree for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBird, J.

On December 5,1904, complainant, Rogers, bought from the State the southeast ¼ of the northwest ¼ and the northeast ¼ of the southwest ¼ of section 10, township 29 north, range 6 east, for the delinquent taxes of 1892. At the same time he was required to and did buy the title of the State for the delinquent taxes of 1890, 1893, 1894, 1898, 1899, and 1900. He also purchased the State bids for the taxes of 1901,” and he paid the taxes levied thereon for the years 1902 and 1903.

On the 16th day of February, 1906, complainant caused to be served upon defendant, Samuel A.. Davison, the owner of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Williams v. OlsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Bolio v. MarvinMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Jackson v. MasonMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Teal Lake Iron Mining Co. v. OldsMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Tucker v. Van WinkleMichigan Supreme Court · 1905

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McBride v. ClosserMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Burch v. NippressMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Weston v. MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Masters v. John Widdicomb Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Rzewuski v. WebbMichigan Supreme Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API