Legal Opinion

Tucker v. Van Winkle

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1905No. Docket No. 83PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from Schoolcraft; Steere, J. Petition by Edgar H. Tucker against Lewis Van Winkle, Charles Montague, and William Bonifas for a writ of assistance. From a decree for defendants, petitioner appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

The petitioner holds the auditor general’s deed to the premises in question. He has filed his petition for a writ of assistance, that he may be put in possession of said lands. Defendants Van Winkle and Charles Montague are the grantees named in the last recorded deed in the regular chain of title to said lands, and' claim to be owners. William Bonifas claims to have an interest in the timber growing upon said land. The petition is opposed, upon the grounds that the notices served did not conform to the requirements of section 140 of the tax law *211(1 Comp. Laws, § 3959), and that proper proof…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Williams v. OlsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1905

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. G. F. Sanborn Co. v. AlstonMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Jackson v. MasonMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Duck v. McQueenMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Morrison v. SemerMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Heethuis v. KerrMichigan Supreme Court · 1917

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API