Legal Opinion

Burch v. Nippress

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1921No. Docket No. 44PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Kent; Brown (William B.), J. Bill by Marsden C. Burch and another against Elmer Nippress to redeem from the sale of land delinquent for taxes. From a decree for plaintiffs, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.

Plaintiffs seek a reconveyance of certain lots in Grand Rapids, to which defendant claims ownership by tax titles. A notice of reconveyance, provided for by section 140 of the tax law (1 Comp. Laws 1915, § 4138), was served on May 25, 1918, on the Grand Rapids Savings Bank, in which the title rested as shown by the records at that time. A notice was also served on the plaintiff Belle H. Burch and on' the Rochester Savings Bank on May 31, 1918, but neither the copy served nor that on which return was made was signed by the defendant or by any one on his behalf. The records showed that at that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dolph v. NortonMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  2. G. F. Sanborn Co. v. RichterMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  3. White v. ShawMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Hansen v. HallMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  5. O'Connor v. GottschalkMichigan Supreme Court · 1907

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Tyler v. BurgesonMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Closser v. AbrahamMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  3. McClure v. KnightMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Drew v. County of BowmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Rzewuski v. WebbMichigan Supreme Court · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API