Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Bilansky v. Hogan

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1916No. Docket No. 106PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Wayne; Hosmer, J. Bill by Harry Bilansky against Annie J. Hogan for specific performance of a land contract. From a decree for defendant, complainant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtSteere, J.

Complainant filed this bill to obtain a *464decree for specific performance of the following contract :

“This agreement made this 24th day of June, 1914, between Annie J. Hogan of the first part and Harry Bilansky of the second part, both of Detroit, Michigan, witnesseth: That the party of the first part agrees to sell and the party of the second part agrees to buy lots 86, 87 and the southerly ten feet of lot 88 in W. A. Butler’s, subdivision of the Cass farm on the easterly side of Third avenue between Hancock and Warren avenues in the city of Detroit aforesaid for the sum of eight thousand…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Murphy v. Schuster Springs Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  2. Loveland v. WarnerOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Czeizler v. RadkeMichigan Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Folkerts v. Marysville Land Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Muirhead v. FreimannMichigan Supreme Court · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API