Legal Opinion

Folkerts v. Marysville Land Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1926No. Docket No. 79PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBird, C. J.

Plaintiffs purchased from defendant on contract two lots in the plat of the contemplated city of Marysville, situate near Port Huron, on the 5th day of February, 1920, in reliance upon a very rosy view painted for them by an agent of defendant as to the future growth of Marysville. The consideration for the two lots was $945 each. The contract contained the following covenant by defendant:

“The seller agrees, as soon as feasible, and within five years from date, at its own expense:
“To construct cement sidewalks, five feet wide across the front of (and in case of corner lots also along side of)…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Emigrant Co. v. County of AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Crampton v. McLaughlin Realty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Bean v. AtwaterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1821
  4. Robinson v. HarbourMississippi Supreme Court · 1869
  5. Tennant Land Co. v. NordemanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. SegallCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1940
  2. Joseph v. RottschaferMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Caulfield v. NoonanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940
  4. Joseph Staszak (81-1476) and Richard Staszak (81-1462) v. Walter RomanikCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
  5. Sutton v. Meyering Land Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1929

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API