Legal Opinion
Loveland v. Warner
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided February 21, 1922PublishedCited by 16 opinions
From Coos: John S. Coke, Judge. Department 1.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, C. J.
— This is an action upon six several promissory notes, the complaint being framed in six counts, one upon each note. Except for date and time of payment they are identical. For the purposes of this opinion it is sufficient to set forth a copy of the first note declared upon, as follows:
“69081 — 345.
“P. O. Marshfield. State — Oregon. 6/20 1917.
“For value received, we promise to pay to the order of The Brenard Manufacturing Company, seventy-two and 50/100 dollars ($72.50), at Iowa *641City, Iowa, payable as below four months after date (amount $72.50).
“Warner Grocery Co.
“By J. E. Warner.
“44396 A…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- International Textbook Co. v. PiggSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Cooper Manufacturing Co. v. FergusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Browning v. City of WaycrossSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Fritts v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- York Manufacturing Co. v. ColleySupreme Court of the United States · 1918
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Durant v. SnyderIdaho Supreme Court · 1944
- Lewis v. SiegmanOregon Supreme Court · 1931
- Rosenkrantz v. BardeOregon Supreme Court · 1923
- Shaw Supply Co., Inc. v. MorganIdaho Supreme Court · 1929
- Wallace v. American Life InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1925
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.