Legal Opinion
Rockney v. Pako Corp.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided April 20, 1988No. Civ. 3-86-549PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
RENNER, District Judge.
Before the Court are the summary judgment motions of defendants Gerard M. Bio- horn and Oliver A. Kimberly. 1 Following a hearing held on January 13, 1988, the Court requested additional briefing and took the matter under advisement. Based on the opinion which follows, summary judgment will be granted as to both defendants.
FACTS
This is an action by four retired employees of Pako Corporation (“Pako”) to collect benefits due them under two unfunded “Top Hat” retirement plans adopted and approved by Pako’s board of directors in 1977 and 1981.
Plaintiffs are all former…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Kimbell Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Donovan v. AgnewCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
- Harry Jung, Individually and on Behalf of All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. Fmc Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Ronald Alman, Etc. v. Jerome DaninCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Orthomet, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation v. A.B. Medical, Inc., a Florida Corporation Ray Aubrey, a Florida Citizen Creighton BeddowCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
- Trustees of the National Elevator Industry Pension v. LutykDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
- Lund, et al. v. CitizensDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1999