Pascua v. Heil
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
*524¶1 On interlocutory review, Crystal and Charles Heil1 contend that the trial court erred in failing to dismiss the personal injury complaint against them because they were improperly served by mail and publication. Because the evidence does not support the authorizing court’s findings that the respondent made a diligent search for Crystal or that Crystal had departed the state with the intent to avoid service of process, service on Crystal was improper. In addition, because Charles was a Florida resident and the method of service utilized by the respondent requires the defendant to be a…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. BosleyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Sidis v. Brodie/Dohrmann, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1991
- Martin v. MeierWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- Thayer v. EdmondsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Scanlan v. TownsendWashington Supreme Court · 2014
- Streeter-Dybdahl v. Nguyet HuynhCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- Streeter-Dybdahl v. HuynhCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- GOETTEMOELLER v. TwistCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- State v. HatchieCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.