Streeter-Dybdahl v. Huynh
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtGrosse, J.
¶1 Proper service of process has not been accomplished when the defendant is not personally served and there is insufficient evidence to establish that the address served was the center of the defendant’s domestic activity. Here, the summons and complaint was left with someone who was not the defendant at a house in which the defendant did not reside and only visited occasionally to pick up mail that was sent to her at that address. Thus, the defendant was not properly served and the trial court erred by denying the defendant’s motion to dismiss for insufficient process. Accordingly, we…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Lybbert v. Grant CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Thayer v. EdmondsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
- Sheldon v. FettigWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- Sheldon v. FettigWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- King v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2002
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Scanlan v. TownsendWashington Supreme Court · 2014
- Farmer v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- Farmer v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- Peggi Northwick v. Andrew LongCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- GOETTEMOELLER v. TwistCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.