Legal Opinion

State v. Hatchie

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 23, 2006No. 31544-1-IIPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*103¶1 Officers entered Raymond Hatchie’s home to arrest Eric Schinnell on a misdemeanor warrant. At the time of entry, the officers had probable cause to believe that Schinnell lived in Hatchie’s home and that Schinnell was present. While inside, the officers discovered evidence of methamphetamine manufacture. The officers then obtained a search warrant for Hatchie’s home. That search warrant eventually led to Hatchie’s conviction for unlawful manufacture of a controlled substance.

Quinn-Brintnall, C.J.

¶2 This appeal presents two significant questions: First, does article I, section 7 of the…

2Cases cited80 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Wilson v. LayneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Welsh v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Minnesota v. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. HatchieWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. HatchieWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  4. State v. HatchieCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  5. State v. McKagueCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API