Legal Opinion

Moncrief v. Sohio Petroleum Co.

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1989No. 88-87, 88-88PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MACY, Justice.

This appeal and cross-appeal arises from an action brought by appellants W.A. Mon-crief, Jr. and Charles Taubman seeking specific performance of an alleged contractual obligation on the part of appellees Sohio Petroleum Company; BHP Petroleum Company, Inc.; Grace Petroleum Corporation; North Central Oil Corporation; Yates Drilling Company; Martin Yates III; *1022and Inexco Oil Company to offer and/or assign appellants an interest in a renewed oil and gas lease and an accounting for appellants’ share of the gas production attributable to their alleged interest in the disputed lease.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Twin-Lick Oil Co. v. MarburySupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Gardner v. Panama RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. Moore v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Patterson v. HewittSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  5. Madrid v. NortonWyoming Supreme Court · 1979

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Cathcart v. MeyerWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Beaulieu v. FlorquistWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Meyer v. NormanWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Moncrief v. Wyoming State Board of EqualizationWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Hammond v. HammondWyoming Supreme Court · 2000

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API