Moncrief v. Sohio Petroleum Co.
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MACY, Justice.
This appeal and cross-appeal arises from an action brought by appellants W.A. Mon-crief, Jr. and Charles Taubman seeking specific performance of an alleged contractual obligation on the part of appellees Sohio Petroleum Company; BHP Petroleum Company, Inc.; Grace Petroleum Corporation; North Central Oil Corporation; Yates Drilling Company; Martin Yates III; *1022and Inexco Oil Company to offer and/or assign appellants an interest in a renewed oil and gas lease and an accounting for appellants’ share of the gas production attributable to their alleged interest in the disputed lease.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Twin-Lick Oil Co. v. MarburySupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Gardner v. Panama RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Moore v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
- Patterson v. HewittSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Madrid v. NortonWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Cathcart v. MeyerWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
- Beaulieu v. FlorquistWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
- Meyer v. NormanWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
- Moncrief v. Wyoming State Board of EqualizationWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
- Hammond v. HammondWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.