Legal Opinion

Norment v. Mardorf

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 1920No. Nos. 2301, 2302PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Santa Fe County; Hollo-man, Judge. Suits by C. G. Mardorf and another against James W. Norment and wife, wherein F. G. Hawkins intervened in one action, and the Security Investment & Development Company in the other. From a ruling in each case refusing leave to intervene, interveners appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT.

ROBERTS, J.

One opinion will dispose of tbe question presented in each of the above cases. Mardorf, as trustee, and the bank, sued Norment and wife to foreclose certain real estate mortgages, and also to enforce a judgment lien which it claimed upon certain real estate. Turley and wife were joined as defendants because they had purchased some of the real estate covered by the lien. The matter went to judgment, and the property was ordered sold. The special master in conformity with the order of the court made the sale and reported the same to the court and asked its…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. New Mexico-Colorado Coal & Mining Co. v. BakerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Baca v. CatronNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Baca v. Unknown Heirs of PalaezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Loftus v. JohnsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Commercial Warehouse Co. v. Hyder Brothers, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Buchanan v. CarpenterNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Baca v. CeballosNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. Flores v. DuranNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Phillips v. Commercial National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API