Legal Opinion

Baca v. Ceballos

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided March 20, 1970No. 439PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WOOD, Judge.

By order of our Supreme Court, compiled as § 21-2-2, N.M.S.A.1953 (Supp. 1969), the rules of practice and procedure in the Supreme Court are made applicable to the Court of Appeals, where pertinent. The rules pertinent here, and with which this opinion is primarily concerned, are paragraphs (1), (2) and (4) of Supreme Court Rule 12 [§ 21-2-1(12), N.M.S.A. 1953 (Supp.1969)] and paragraph (4) of Supreme Court Rule 16 (§ 21-2-1(16), N.M.S.A.1953). The issue is whether the appeal should be dismissed. An issue raised subsequent to the preparation of this opinion is whether…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Scott v. BrownNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Federal National Mortgage Ass'n v. Rose Realty, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
  3. City of Hobbs v. Chesport, Ltd.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Chronister Ex Rel. Chronister v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Norment v. MardorfNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1920

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Al-Hamim v. Star Hearthstone, LLCColorado Court of Appeals · 2024
  2. Reliance Insurance v. MarchiondoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Baca v. CeballosNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970
  4. State v. LauderdaleNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. State v. LauderdaleNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API