Legal Opinion

Hover v. MacKenzie

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 26, 1954No. Civ. 19910PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VALLÉE, J.

Appeal by defendants and cross-complainants from: (1) an order granting plaintiff and cross-defendant’s motion for reconsideration of the denial of a motion to vacate and set aside a judgment; (2) an order setting aside and vacating an order denying a motion of plaintiff and cross-defendant to vacate and set aside a judgment; (3) an order setting aside and vacating the default of plaintiff and cross-defendant and a judgment.

Plaintiff filed the action, apparently to quiet title. The complaint is not a part of the record. Defendants filed a cross-complaint naming plaintiff as…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Elms v. ElmsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  2. Harth v. Ten EyckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Baratti v. BarattiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. Jones v. Title Guaranty Etc. Co.California Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Greene v. Montana Brewing Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1905

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Bice v. StevensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  2. Fitzsimmons v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. San Francisco Lathing, Inc. v. Superior Court of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  4. O'BRIEN v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Dahlin v. MoonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API