Legal Opinion

In Re the Arbitration Between Sea Dragon, Inc. & Gebr. Van Weelde Scheepvaartkantoor B.V.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided October 6, 1983No. 83 Civ. 1485 (KTD)PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM & ORDER

KEVIN THOMAS DUFFY, District Judge:

Petitioner, Sea Dragon, Inc. (“Sea Dragon”), owner of the vessel M.V. DIMOS HALCOUSSIS, seeks to confirm an arbitration award against respondent, Gebr. Van Weelde Scheepvaartkantoor B.V. (“Van Weelde”), charterer of the same vessel. Petitioner is a Panamanian corporation and respondent is a Dutch corporation. For the reasons set forth below, the arbitration award is vacated.

I

FACTS

In June, 1981, the parties entered into a contract for the shipment of four cargoes of sugar. The vessel performed the chartered voyage and discharged on February…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Wilko v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. Hilton v. GuyotSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. Diapulse Corporation of America v. Carba, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  5. Saxis Steamship Co. v. Multifacs International Traders, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Telenor Mobile Communications AS v. STORM LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
  2. Yukos Capital S.A.R.L. v. OAO SamaraneftegazDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
  3. Dworkin-Cosell Interair Courier Services, Inc. v. AvrahamDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
  4. Van Den Biggelaar v. WagnerDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1997
  5. LOCAL 2, INTERN. BROTH. OF ELEC. v. Gerstner Elec.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API