Legal Opinion

David v. Veitscher Magnesitwerke Actien Gesellschaft

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 26, 1943No. Appeal, 232PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Maxey,

The court below entered a judgment for the plaintiff, Dr. Michael David, for $9,798.46 with interest, for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense as to part of a claim and sustaining plaintiff’s reply raising questions of law to new matter included in the affidavit of defense. From this judgment the defendant, Veitscher Magnesitwerke Actien Gesellschaft (hereinafter referred to as VMAG) takes this appeal.

The action was begun on May 18, 1939, by writ of foreign attachment garnisheeing moneys belonging to VMAG, totaling approximately $21,000. The claim was…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Lynch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Retirement Board v. McGovernSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  3. Roddy v. ValentineNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
  4. Moscow Fire Insurance v. Bank of New York & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1939
  5. Schofield v. Zion's Co-Op. Mercantile InstitutionUtah Supreme Court · 1934

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Jacoby v. Grays Harbor Chair & Mfg. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Harvey v. Allegheny County Retirement BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  3. Buzzone v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
  4. Siegel v. First Pennsylvania Banking and Trust Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1961
  5. Stopford v. Boonton Molding Co., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1970

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API