Legal Opinion

State v. Newfield

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 18, 1989No. 2 CA-CR 88-0483PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROLL, Judge.

Bret Newfield appeals from his conviction of one count of arson of a structure. Because fundamental error occurred when the trial court failed to define the term “unlawfully” in the jury instructions, we reverse Newfield’s conviction and remand this matter for a new trial.

FACTS

On December 6, 1987, when Newfield’s girlfriend, Valerie, completed her work shift at the Palo Verde Nuclear Power Plant, Newfield met her in the parking lot and the two argued. Valerie and some other individuals then travelled in a 1980 Chevy Monza to an overflow parking lot where co-workers parked…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. IslasCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
  2. Rolph v. City Court of City of MesaArizona Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. DurantUtah Supreme Court · 1983

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. EastlackArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Keats v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. MillanesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  4. People v. VincentMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
  5. People v. VincentMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API