People v. Vincent
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Mat,t.ktt, C.J.
We granted leave in this case to determine whether the Court of Appeals properly characterized a particular statement made by a trial judge as a directed verdict of acquittal. We reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals and hold that the judge’s inchoate observations did not ripen into a directed verdict of acquittal and did not become a final judgment. There was neither a written or signed order nor an oral or written ruling on the record sufficiently detailing the reasons for granting or denying the motion. Consequently, the defendant’s constitutional right not to be…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United States v. Martin Linen Supply Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Justices of Boston Municipal Court v. LydonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- People v. WolfeMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
- People v. HamptonMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Price, Warden v. VincentSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- People v. MayhewMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
- People v. SchultzMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001
- People v. LettMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
- Arbor Farms, LLC v. Geostar Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2014
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.