State v. Millanes
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GRANT, Judge.
In this opinion we hold that a defendant does not waive a double jeopardy claim by merely failing to raise it in the trial court. We further hold that the trial court’s action in submitting a charge to the jury after initially granting an acquittal on the basis of insufficient evidence violates the prohibition against double jeopardy. Therefore, we reverse the conviction on the charge that was the subject of the acquittal. The remaining convictions and sentences are affirmed.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Robert Jesse Millanes (defendant) was indicted on charges of third…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. Martin Linen Supply Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Alabama v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- State v. Chabolla-HinojosaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
- State v. SiddleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- Johnson v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. MirandaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
- State v. BurdickCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.