Legal Opinion

State v. Durant

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1983No. 18051PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURHAM, Justice:

In this case the defendant appeals from a conviction of aggravated arson, a second degree felony. In a statement to the police, the defendant admitted setting a house on fire, but claimed that he was acting under the direction of the owner of the house. In his appeal the defendant claims that under U.C.A., 1953, § 76-6-103 the owner could not have been convicted of aggravated arson for setting fire to his own home. Therefore, the defendant argues that he should not have been convicted of aggravated arson because he was acting as the owner’s agent. We disagree and affirm the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bastian v. KingUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Nielsen v. MFT LEASINGUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State v. ChristendonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1970
  4. State v. PerezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Keats v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State v. JimenezUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  3. State v. NewfieldCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
  4. State v. HobbsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2003
  5. State v. ClarkUtah Supreme Court · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API