Legal Opinion

United States v. Jose Luis Aviles-Alvarez

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 1, 1989No. 88-5001PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALARCON, Circuit Judge:

Jose Luis Aviles-Alvarez appeals from his conviction after a jury trial for importing heroin and possessing heroin with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 952, 960 and 963. Aviles-Al-varez contends that the district court should have dismissed the case against him because he was not brought to trial within 70 days as required by the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161 et seq. We affirm because the district court’s finding that an unresolved pretrial motion was pending on the date the request for dismissal was heard was not clearly erroneous.

I

On…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Henderson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United States v. Gale Gordon FreyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  3. United States v. Richard E. Schuster, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  4. United States v. Richard E. Schuster, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. United States v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  2. United States v. James Daychild, United States of America v. Patrick O. NeissCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  3. United States v. Raoul Barrie ClymerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  4. United States v. MincoffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. United States v. Nagesh ShettyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API